This is a hugely atmospheric book set in London in
1850. It reeks of gothic undertones, poverty and social class delineation. The
characters are memorable and full of colour.
The female protagonist, Iris,
moves from abject poverty to a life of relative luxury by becoming an artist’s
model, even though the impact of this on her status in society brings mixed
reactions.She learns to paint and finds
herself thrown into the esoteric world of the Pre- Raphaelite painters.
On so many levels, this is a good read. There is much
that is factual and true to the period and the novice to historical fiction
will be drawn in and wanting to find out more.There is a love story with a strong female character who does not
hesitate to explore her sexuality. There is a dark subplot involving stalking
and kidnap which is chilling.
My only disappointment was the ending which
seemed to lose impact, but perhaps there is another episode to appear in the
future?
I have no
hesitation in recommending this book and I am just sorry that I missed it as a
serialized book at bedtime on BBC radio 4.
Imagine for a moment that you have been
asked about the personality and colour of smell in a job interview. What would
you talk about? It is known that some people visualise colours when they smell
certain scents, and this is apparently more common in artists. Perhaps it is
possible to train the brain to recognise scents from other sensations.
Let's keep it simple and focus on a few
specific scents and describe visual characteristics and memory prompts.
Coffee is the first. The smell of freshly
brewed coffee, or coffee beans roasting in an oven must be familiar to
everyone. Coffee is exotic and exuberant, dancing in the streets of Rio de
Janeiro clothed in bright coloured feathers, attracting crowds. No shrinking
violet is coffee. In your face, loving media attention, alert, head turningly
attractive, ready for anything. That is the personality of coffee.
Somewhat gentler is the scent of lemon.
Soft downy day old chicks, pale yellow baby shawls, flowers imitate the colour
beautifully. A confused fruit that looks so very inviting but the juicy flesh
is bitter like an unmarried aunt. Memories of walking in Mediterranean fields
with crushed thyme and mint triggering lemon like whiffs, but never quite
succeeding. Tall, thin and acerbic, a bit stand offish, an observer rather than
a game player. That is the personality of lemon.
And now for garlic. Garlic is a bumbling
Pickwickian character, with black greasy hair sleeked back with Brylcreem, a
waddling gait and a sweaty handshake. He is a seedy vacuum cleaner salesman who
wheedles his way into your home and leaves you with a bad taste in the mouth.
On the positive side, he loves entertaining and having his large family around
for spectacular Italian dinners al fresco. He never bothers the very young or
very elderly and is indulged by many for his good nature and loyalty. A
colourful character who may burst into song with a glass of red wine in his
hand.
The scent of rose is altogether different.
Overpoweringly seductive, she is approaching middle age, her face heavily made
up. Her hair is bleached blonde and bouffant style, maintained with strong hold
hair spray. Her ample bosom straining to be free of her expensive French
lingerie, she walks with a flick of the hips which openly states her
availability. Beware young men, she might tempt you into dangerous ways!When seen strolling down the High Street, men
doff their caps to her hiding a hint of a smirk, while women indignantly rustle
their skirts and turn the other way.
Now have I got you thinking about
personalities and smell? Where will your imagination lead you? Your turn to
try. Your interviewers will be impressed.
Why do people write? There are many different answers to this question, but the theme that runs through all the answers is because it gives pleasure to the writer. Not everyone will be lucky enough to earn money from their writing, and dare I say it, this is not actually as important as you might think. The personal benefits from writing are what counts, at least initially.
When you speak, your words disappear into the air, and unless someone records your speech, they may never be recalled accurately. When you write, on the other hand, you are making a permanent or semi-permanent record of your words. When you do this, you are bringing together different strands from your upbringing, education, culture and genetics. Everything you write is entirely individual to you. No-one else has ever written identical words. You are making a unique statement.
In this way you are expanding your personality into new areas of consciousness, you are putting out feelers into the complex and fascinating world of language. Every word that you learn, whether in your mother tongue or in a foreign language will enrich your vocabulary . New sounds, new meanings, connections between languages, dialects, regional variants of speech – all these things will come together to increase your depth of knowledge and influence what you write.
And the best part of all this? You only need a pen and a notebook to get started. What a great excuse to go out and buy some lovely new stationery.
Secondly, you will start to read things differently. You will become aware of the plot and the way the characters are described in a novel that you are reading. You will start to be able to critically analyse others writings.
And finally, you will begin to learn things about yourself and new coping strategies. Stories from your childhood will reappear in technicolour detail, conversations you thought you had forgotten burst back into your memory . You will be able to immerse yourself into fantasy when real life becomes a bit too serious. Colourful characters will march across your consciousness. You can legitimately peer into their lives, move them about puppet like into imagined situations, and all from the comfort of your very own arm chair.
Next time I will talk about how you can incorporate writing into your life, even if you have never attempted to put pen to paper since you left school or college.
Essentially a love story, Nicholas becomes besotted
with Etna and determines to marry her. He cannot understand her initial
reluctance, but his persistence pays off. However, Etna remains somewhat
distant and unemotional. It is not until the end of the novel that the reasons
for her unhappiness unravel.
Set in New Hampshire in the late 1800s, the description
of the characters and their small town life is realistic and enduring. The
limitations of society and lack of opportunity drive the characters into circumstances
which seem immutable. The deep unhappiness of Etna contrasting with the obsessive
love displayed by Nicholas makes for disturbing reading. The reader’s sympathies
are split between the two.
This is a book that will remain in my memory as a
skilled depiction of an unequal and unsatisfactory relationship. There is a
sadness that seeps through the narrative that does not leave the reader easily.
⚝⚝⚝⚝
This book gives the reader a
fast paced trip through Greek mythology. The heroine, Circe, is depicted as an
awkward child, not endowed with beauty, desperately craving affection in her early
years. Unaware of her powers at first, she grows into a strong willed, independent
young woman, not afraid to challenge long existing traditions. Her punishment for
stepping outside the boundaries is to be in lifelong isolation on a far off
island. Here, she develops her powers by learning about the plants and herbs
which grow around her, producing powerful potions and manipulating her world.
Encounters with human love,
power intrigues, witchcraft and monsters keep the reader enthralled. This is a
rewriting of myths from a feminist point of view with a freshness that draws
the reader in. Young readers will enjoy
the magical world while admiring the stoic persistence of a woman against
adversity.
My only disappointment was the
ending. This was somewhat predictable and a little flat after the extraordinary
encounters throughout the novel. However, I believe many readers will now be
stimulated to dip into the Greek mythologies to learn more as a result of
reading this book. ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Martin Luther King, in one of his speeches
states; 'This is no time for apathy or complacency'. I believe this may be the origin of the
currently in favour phrase 'This is no time for complacency'. Our current
political and medical experts leaders have repeated this phrase, along with the
constantly recurring advice to stay at home in this unprecedented Coronovirus pandemic. It is not so commonly paired with
apathy, perhaps because accusing people of complacency is less inflammatory
than describing them as apathetic. It is a phrase that appears to add gravitas
to rhetoric with undertones of evangelism.
But what does complacency actually mean? Various dictionaries describe it as ' a
feeling of smug or uncritical satisfaction with oneself or one's achievements', '
a feeling of contentment or self-satisfaction, especially when coupled with an
unawareness of danger, trouble or controversy',' a
feeling of being satisfied with how
things are and not wanting to try to make them better'.
In our present culture, it also seems to signify an unwillingness to become
involved in political opinion.
We are exhorted to not be complacent about
a multitude of topics. In the past few years alone, ‘there is no time for
complacency’ about equality ,drugs used in competitive sport, trade developments
in the EU, varroa treatment of bee populations, the medicalisation of e-cigs
and cannabis and last but not least, climate change.
As if all that were not enough, turn on
the television over the Christmas period especially and you are bombarded with
heart tugging advertisements to save the tiger, whale, dolphins, donkeys and
pets of all types. Then there are the starving children throughout the world, water
contamination, deaf/mute children, those who are alone at Christmas, the
homeless, refugees, war torn devastation and other distressing human conditions
to consider.
To take into consideration all these
demands for our attention places an impossible burden on the average person. In
order to avoid complacency, we must also factor in present dangers and future
risks. We must consider the heightened security status of the world today, be
aware of terrorist threats, consider health and safety issues in the workplace,
and remain vigilant for any abnormal or threatening behaviour in those around
us. And now the present threat of the Coronavirus pandemic overwhelms us all.
Vladimir Nabokov stated: 'Complacency is a
state of mind that exists only in retrospective; it has to be shattered before
being ascertained’. It is true that we do not set out to become complacent.
When accused of complacency we can either acknowledge that it might be true, or
emphatically deny it (thus proving our complacency). We must all be complacent
to a degree, as it is surely impossible to achieve a status of
self-satisfaction without ignoring some aspects of concern about humanity and
the environment. So is the theory proposed by Robert Bruce Raup in 1925 (then
Professor in the Philosophy of Education at Columbia University) in his
publication entitled 'Complacency: the Foundation of Human Behaviour', a
continuing reality in today's society?
The NHS has introduced multitudes of
protocols and performance management targets. Undoubtedly some areas of poor
performance have improved as a result, but the end point becomes satisfaction
at achieving a target without looking at potential further improvements. A
'good enough' culture is now established. This, in my opinion, simply affirms a
base line of complacency.
Is it possible to exclude complacency from
our lives? I very much doubt it. We almost need it as a fallback option when
life gets too tough and the present dangers mushroom around us. A degree of
self satisfaction is mandatory in order to experience contentment, and to be
constantly battling with inadequacy, human distress, and environmental
destruction creates paranoia and fearfulness.
I suggest that, occasionally, we need to
find time for complacency: a short relief from the exigencies of this media
heavy environment we live in, a place of
simplification, a brief but
welcome comfort zone before taking on the world again. So, use your complacency
with care. A little in times of mental distress goes a long way. For the rest
of the time, vigilance and self-distancing will work well along with frequent
hand washing.
This book was published in 2010
but I read it for the first time recently.
The concept of capturing a
snapshot of the lives of two people on the same day every year over an extended
period is innovative if a bit contrived as a vehicle of story telling.
The two main characters, Emma
and Dexter are very different in upbringing and character. They are drawn
together into an extraordinary strong friendship which has sexual undertones
from the beginning. While Emma pursues a mundane existence, Dexter pushes the
boundaries of alcohol, illicit drugs and casual sex. Despite Emma’s dislike of
his lifestyle, their friendship becomes a dependency, which tests them both.
Humorous but not laugh out
loud, sympathetic and realistic; this is a good read. Initially I disliked
Dexter but it is hard not to feel drawn to his damaged character and the
descriptions of life in the early 90’s are deliciously reminiscent. Banality,
stupidity, addiction, loyalty, family tensions. This is life in a very readable
form.